For Immediate
Release
Contact: Jeff Lieberson
April 1,
2008
202-225-6335 (office)
202-225-0817 (cell)
Hinchey Blasts NYRI Request
for Ratepayer Subsidy;
Will Urge Federal Government
to Reject NYRI Petition
Washington
, DC --
Congressman Maurice Hinchey
(D-NY) today expressed his
unequivocal opposition to a
petition recently filed with
the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC)
by New York Regional
Interconnect (NYRI) that
would use ratepayer
surcharges to guarantee a
rate of return for the
company's financial
backers. Hinchey, along
with other members of
Congress, will soon send a
letter to FERC Chairman
Joseph T. Kelliher urging
the Commission to reject
NYRI's latest application.
NYRI has petitioned FERC to
set a project life-time rate
of return on equity (ROE) of
13.5 percent for their
proposed power line under
provisions contained in the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 --
legislation that Hinchey
opposed and voted against.
The Energy Policy Act
directed FERC to develop
incentive-based rate
treatments for transmission
of electric energy in
interstate commerce.
"The audacity of NYRI
requesting rate incentives
is stunning," Hinchey said.
"Not only has this
corporation worked to
circumvent state permitting
authority and force their
ill-conceived power line
upon communities throughout
eight counties, but now it
wants New York ratepayers to
guarantee NYRI's investors a
handsome profit. In
essence, ratepayers will be
forced to subsidize a
foreign-owned corporation
for its costs of developing
this power line, including
seizing private property,
and investor profits for an
unjustified project that
will destroy many of our
communities.
"This type of corporate
socialism comes directly out
of the secret meetings that
Vice President Dick Cheney
had with energy companies to
develop the Energy Policy
Act. These corporate
subsidies will be placed on
the back of local ratepayers
who are already struggling
under the weight of rising
costs and an economy in
recession. FERC should
soundly dismiss this
ridiculous and offensive
request for preferential
treatment."
In its request to FERC, NYRI
highlighted "permitting
challenges" as being one of
the reasons why it needed
the higher return on
investment (ROE.) NYRI
further noted that their
project required this
special rate treatment in
order to obtain construction
financing and continue
development activities.
Hinchey continued, "It seems
that NYRI has to depend upon
subsidies and special
advantages to advance this
project, which in a free and
open market would have no
chance of being financed or
constructed. We know that
this project is not needed
and that there are much more
reasonable alternatives for
our energy future, such as
increasing energy efficiency
and promoting renewable
energy. Since its project
cannot compete with the
alternatives, NYRI continues
to try to tip the playing
field in its favor at the
expense of local communities
and ratepayers. It's
ludicrous that NYRI feels
its legal fees should be
financed by the very people
who strongly oppose it in
the first place."
The congressman is
continuing to pursue a
variety of legislative
solutions to block NYRI from
moving forward with its
plans to develop an
unnecessary and
environmentally-detrimental
190-mile power line through
upstate :StateNew York .
The letter from Hinchey and
his colleagues in the House
to FERC is expected to be
sent in the coming days.